A new court filing is the nail in the coffin for a Democrat talking point.
Their efforts to smear Donald Trump were utter fabrication.
Jim Jordan made a Democrat hoax completely implode with these four words.
Republican Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan slammed the Trump/Russia collusion narrative after a Friday court filing by special counsel John Durham showed that key evidence supporting the conspiracy was implausible very early on.
“The CIA knew as early as 2017 that the Trump/Russia collusion data was not ‘technically plausible’ and was ‘user created.’ In other words, it was made up. But Democrats and the media told you otherwise!” Jordan said in a social media post.
Former President Donald Trump was forced to deal with constant allegations of collusion with Russia during his campaign and throughout his presidency. Ex-special counsel Robert Mueller spent three years and millions in taxpayer dollars to investigate the claim that the Trump campaign had illegally coordinated with Russian agents to influence the 2016 election, and found no advice of collusion.
Durham alleges that Attorney Michael Sussmann, who previously worked for the Seattle-based law firm Perkins Coie, approached the FBI under what Durham alleges were false pretenses because he withheld the information that his research was funded by the Clinton campaign and the DNC.
Sussmann claimed that he had evidence of a backdoor deal between Trump Tower in New York and Alfa-Bank, which has ties to the Russian government.
Sussmann “provided data which he claimed reflected purportedly suspicious DNS lookups by these entities of internet protocol addresses affiliated with a Russian mobile phone provider” that also “demonstrated that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations,” according to the special counsel.
“The Special Counsel’s Office has identified no support for these allegations,” Durham wrote in February.
The CIA, by 2017, knew that some of the information that Sussmann had given to the FBI was not “technically plausible” and was “user created,” according to Durham’s Friday filing.
“For example, while the FBI did not reach an ultimate conclusion regarding the data’s accuracy or whether it might have been in whole or in part genuine, spoofed, altered, or fabricated, Agency-2 concluded in early 2017 that the Russian Bank-1 data and Russian Phone Provider-1 data was not ‘technically plausible,’ did not ‘withstand technical scrutiny,’ ‘contained gaps,’ ‘conflicted with [itself],’ and was ‘user created and not machine/tool generated.’ The Special Counsel’s Office has not reached a definitive conclusion in this regard,” Durham wrote.
The former Perkins Coie attorney’s trial is set to begin next month. He has been charged with lying to the FBI.
If you want Black Eye Politics to keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.
