Dr. Anthony Fauci got some bad news.
The tyrannical head of America’s COVID response is finally facing accountability.
And a judge is about to force Dr. Fauci to do one big thing that could land him in prison.
The states of Missouri and Louisiana are in the middle of a lawsuit against the Biden administration for pressuring social media companies to censor conservatives critical of COVID vaccine mandates.
Private entities lose their First Amendment protections when they act on demands of the government to censor content.
A judge allowed Missouri and Louisiana to move into discovery which means they get access to documents and witness depositions.
Now a judge is allowing the two states to receive sworn under oath testimony from the following administration officials:
(1)NIAID Director and White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci, (2) Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of White House Digital Strategy Rob Flaherty, (3) former White House Senior COVID-19 Advisory Andrew Slavitt, (4) former White House Press Secretary Jennifer Psaki, (5) FBI Supervisory Special Agent Elvis Chan, (6) CISA Director Jen Easterly, (7) CISA official Lauren Protentis, (8) Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, (9) CDC Chief of the Digital Media Branch Carol Crawford, and (10) Acting Coordinator of the State Department’s Global Engagement Center Daniel Kimmage.
Dr. Fauci submitted a written response to Missouri and Louisiana’s requests denying all knowledge about the administration’s scheme to pressure social media companies to censor critics of Joe Biden’s COVID vaccine policies.
The court ruled that was inadequate.
“Government Defendants have submitted to Plaintiffs interrogatory responses on behalf of Dr. Fauci, asserting that he has had no direct communications with any social-media platforms regarding censorship.20 Plaintiffs argue in turn that they should not be required to simply accept those blanket statements as they were submitted, and they argue three reasons why Dr. Fauci should be questioned under oath,” the order read.
The court then found Dr. Fauci’s claim he had no knowledge of the Biden administration’s plan to censor COVID vaccine critics unbelievable.
“After reviewing the Plaintiffs and the Defendants’ arguments, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have proven that Dr. Fauci has personal knowledge about the issue concerning censorship across social media as it related to COVID-19 and ancillary issues of COVID-19,” the order continued.
The judge in the case listed three reasons to not take Fauci at his word that he had no knowledge of the censorship protocols.
First, Dr. Fauci did not verify his answers himself.
Instead, an underling claimed Fauci was being truthful.
Second, the judge ruled that Fauci made his belief that social media should censor COVID vaccine critics known to intermediaries who passed that belief along to Big Tech companies.
Lastly, Dr. Fauci’s been caught in repeated lies in his public statements about COVID such as the efficacy of masks, funding gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and what percentage of the population needed to take the vaccine in order to achieve herd immunity so the states of Missouri and Louisiana had compelling reason to take Dr. Fauci’s sworn testimony.
Dr. Fauci will now testify under oath.
If Dr. Fauci gets caught lying again, he could face perjury charges.
Black Eye Politics will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story and the rest of the breaking news in politics, please bookmark our site, consider making us your homepage and forward our content with your friends on social media and email.