Brett Kavanaugh’s accusers are hiding something.
The media and Democrats are covering up bombshell secrets about their past.
But something from Kavanaugh’s accuser’s past just changed everything.
A Third Accuser Steps Forward
Julie Swetnick stepped forward to lob horrible accusations at Brett Kavanaugh.
She claimed that when she was in college she attended high school parties with Kavanaugh.
Swetnick alleged Kavanaugh helped women get drunk so his friends could gang rape them.
She also claims Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge were present when she was gang raped.
Swetnick hired left-wing attorney Michael Avenatti to represent her.
Avenatti appeared on The View to announce Swetnick’s allegations.
But he would not answer if Kavanaugh assaulted Swetnick.
That was a big red flag for many viewers.
Julie Swetnick’s Checkered Past
Critics say Julie Swetnick is not a credible accuser.
She owns a checkered past that makes it difficult to believe her unverified allegations.
Swetnick’s ex-boyfriend won a restraining order against her in 2001.
He claimed she threatened him and his children after they broke up.
Politico reported on their exclusive interview with Richard Vinneccy:
According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.
“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. “I know a lot about her.”
Vinneccy – who is a registered Democrat – cast doubt on Swetnick’s credibility.
Politico also reported:
Vinneccy made clear that he did not believe her story.
“I have a lot of facts, evidence, that what she’s saying is not true at all,” he said. “I would rather speak to my attorney first before saying more.”
Swetnick has other problems.
In 2015 Maryland placed a lien on her property.
She owed $32,000 in back taxes from 2008 and another $27,000 in interest.
That was not all.
In 2016 the IRS assessed her a bill of $40,000 in unpaid taxes.
Finally, Swetnick filed a sexual harassment complaint a decade ago against her then employer New York Life Insurance.
The law firm run by Debra Katz – who now represents Kavanaugh accuser Christine Ford – provided legal work for Swetnick.
Critics wondered if this proved collusion.
The Bottom Line
Swetnick is not a credible witness.
The New York Times reported they could not corroborate her claims.
Her story is full of more holes than even Christine Ford’s or Deborah Ramirez’s flimsy allegations.
But the media treated her suspect claims as absolute truth.
That’s because outlets like CNN and the Washington Post are fake news.
They are engaged in a smear campaign to destroy Kavanaugh because they are afraid he will vote to overturn Roe v. Wade.
For the left, abortion is the Holy Grail.
They will do anything to protect their ability to kill babies.
And that included smearing a man with lies and fake news.
We will keep you up to date on any new developments in this ongoing story.